Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

P ZERO PZ4

9.1

R13 – R23

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

e.Ziex

P ZERO PZ4

Number of tests

1

3

14

Best position

#13

#2

Average position

13.0

3.7

5.5

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

15

34

706

Wet

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Dry

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Costs

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

ACTIVAN WINTER

e.Ziex

P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison