Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

Cinturato P7 C2

8.9

R16 – R20

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

e.Ziex

Cinturato P7 C2

Number of tests

1

3

9

Best position

#13

#2

Average position

13.0

3.7

5.8

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

15

34

92

Wet

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

82%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

81%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

78%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

86%

Dry

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

88%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

87%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

87%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

83%

Costs

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

66%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

65%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato P7 C2

ACTIVAN WINTER

e.Ziex

Cinturato P7 C2

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison