Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

9.4

R16 – R20

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Number of tests

1

3

4

Best position

#13

#2

#1

Average position

13.0

3.7

3.3

Latest test

2019

2025

2026

Available sizes

15

34

—

Wet

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

94%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

97%

Dry

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

100%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

89%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3)

ACTIVAN WINTER

e.Ziex

Cinturato (C3)

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison