Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Hankook ION Evo

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

Falken

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

e.Ziex

Primacy 4+

ION Evo

Number of tests

1

3

13

1

Best position

#13

#2

#1

Average position

13.0

3.7

4.3

1.0

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

15

34

123

64

Wet

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Michelin Primacy 4+

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Michelin Primacy 4+

78%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Michelin Primacy 4+

72%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Michelin Primacy 4+

79%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Dry

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Michelin Primacy 4+

87%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Comfort

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Primacy 4+

86%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin Primacy 4+

77%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Costs

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Michelin Primacy 4+

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Michelin Primacy 4+

91%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Primacy 4+ vs. Hankook ION Evo

ACTIVAN WINTER

e.Ziex

Primacy 4+

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison