18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Primacy 4+

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Michelin Primacy 4+Premium
MichelinMichelin

Primacy 4+

7.6
R16 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Primacy 4+
Number of tests
1
3
13
Best position
#13
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
3.7
4.3
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
34
123

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Primacy 4+
75%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin Primacy 4+
72%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Primacy 4+
79%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin Primacy 4+
78%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin Primacy 4+
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
86%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Primacy 4+
77%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Primacy 4+
80%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Michelin Primacy 4+
91%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison