18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Falken
e.Ziex
Michelin
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
3
7
3
Best position
#13
#2
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
3.7
2.4
3.3
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
34
137
40

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
90%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison