18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
1
3
3
Best position
#13
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
34
60

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison