18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Hankook ION EvoPremium
HankookHankook

ION Evo

9.0
R17 – R22
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
3
1
Best position
#13
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
3.7
1.0
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
34
64

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Hankook ION Evo
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison