18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Falken
e.Ziex
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Number of tests
1
3
3
3
Best position
#13
#2
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
3.7
3.3
4.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
15
34
40
126

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison