18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
1
3
5
26
Best position
#13
#2
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
3.7
2.2
2.2
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
34
63
66

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison