18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental SportContact 7

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
SportContact 7
Number of tests
1
3
15
Best position
#13
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
3.7
1.2
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
34
122

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental SportContact 7
84%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental SportContact 7
85%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental SportContact 7
95%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental SportContact 7
86%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental SportContact 7
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental SportContact 7
66%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental SportContact 7
91%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Continental SportContact 7
97%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental SportContact 7
75%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental SportContact 7
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison