18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Bridgestone Turanza 6

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Falken
e.Ziex
Bridgestone
Turanza 6
Number of tests
1
3
13
Best position
#13
#2
#2
Average position
13.0
3.7
6.2
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
34
225

Wet

Wet
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
74%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
70%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%

Dry

Dry
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
77%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
71%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
62%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
65%

Costs

Costs
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
73%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Bridgestone Turanza 6
70%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison