Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Continental

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

VanContact Winter

CARRIER WINTER

PorTran CW51

Number of tests

1

2

1

Best position

#13

#1

#2

#8

Average position

13.0

1.0

2.0

8.0

Latest test

2019

Available sizes

15

46

36

21

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

49%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

83%

Continental

VanContact Winter

69%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

65%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Wet Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Continental VanContact Winter

87%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

69%

Kumho PorTran CW51

49%

Wet Handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Continental VanContact Winter

90%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

57%

Kumho PorTran CW51

46%

Wet Circle Cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Continental VanContact Winter

83%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

72%

Kumho PorTran CW51

72%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Continental VanContact Winter

78%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

67%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Aquaplaning Cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Continental VanContact Winter

78%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Dry Performance

82%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Continental

VanContact Winter

71%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

78%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Dry Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Continental VanContact Winter

82%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

71%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Snow Performance

68%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

77%

Continental

VanContact Winter

75%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

70%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Snow Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

78%

Continental VanContact Winter

67%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Snow Traction

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

72%

Continental VanContact Winter

83%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

83%

Kumho PorTran CW51

72%

Snow Handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

53%

Continental VanContact Winter

80%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

64%

Kumho PorTran CW51

60%

Ice Performance

86%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

74%

Continental

VanContact Winter

78%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

78%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Ice Braking Abs

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

86%

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

74%

Kumho PorTran CW51

81%

Ice Lateral Guidance

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

86%

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

81%

Kumho PorTran CW51

74%

Comfort & Noise

66%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

69%

Continental

VanContact Winter

64%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

71%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Noise Exterior

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Continental VanContact Winter

67%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

56%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Noise Interior

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

60%

Continental VanContact Winter

71%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

71%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Economy

90%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

74%

Continental

VanContact Winter

83%

Pirelli

CARRIER WINTER

76%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Fuel Efficiency

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

91%

Continental VanContact Winter

80%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

87%

Kumho PorTran CW51

84%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Continental VanContact Winter

67%

Pirelli CARRIER WINTER

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

67%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
ADAC	Winter	2019	205/65 R16	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Pirelli CARRIER WINTER vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

ACTIVAN WINTER

VanContact Winter

CARRIER WINTER

PorTran CW51

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison