18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
VanContact Winter
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
1
2
10
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
1.0
6.0
Latest test
2019
2019
2026
Available sizes
15
46
104

Wet

Wet
Continental VanContact Winter
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental VanContact Winter
95%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental VanContact Winter
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental VanContact Winter
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental VanContact Winter
94%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Continental VanContact Winter
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Snow

Snow
Continental VanContact Winter
85%

Dry

Dry
Continental VanContact Winter
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental VanContact Winter
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental VanContact Winter
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental VanContact Winter
65%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Continental VanContact Winter
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Costs

Costs
Continental VanContact Winter
43%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Continental VanContact Winter
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Ice

Ice
Continental VanContact Winter
74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison