18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
VanContact Winter
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
1
2
1
5
Best position
#13
#1
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
1.0
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2019
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
46
64
63

Wet

Wet
Continental VanContact Winter
84%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Continental VanContact Winter
92%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental VanContact Winter
95%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental VanContact Winter
74%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental VanContact Winter
81%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental VanContact Winter
94%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%

Snow

Snow
Continental VanContact Winter
75%

Dry

Dry
Continental VanContact Winter
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental VanContact Winter
72%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental VanContact Winter
70%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental VanContact Winter
65%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Ice

Ice
Continental VanContact Winter
74%

Costs

Costs
Continental VanContact Winter
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison