18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Continental VanContact WinterPremium
ContinentalContinental

VanContact Winter

R14 – R17
Firestone Roadhawk 2Upper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Roadhawk 2

8.0
R16 – R22
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3) Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
VanContact Winter
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
1
2
6
Best position
#13
#1
#3
Average position
13.0
1.0
4.7
Latest test
2019
2019
2026
Available sizes
15
46
146

Wet

Wet
Continental VanContact Winter
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental VanContact Winter
94%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Continental VanContact Winter
92%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental VanContact Winter
95%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental VanContact Winter
74%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental VanContact Winter
81%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%

Dry

Dry
Continental VanContact Winter
62%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental VanContact Winter
72%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Snow

Snow
Continental VanContact Winter
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental VanContact Winter
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental VanContact Winter
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Ice

Ice
Continental VanContact Winter
74%

Costs

Costs
Continental VanContact Winter
43%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison