18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Falken e.Ziex

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Continental VanContact WinterPremium
ContinentalContinental

VanContact Winter

R14 – R17
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
VanContact Winter
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
2
3
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2019
2019
2025
Available sizes
15
46
34

Wet

Wet
Continental VanContact Winter
94%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental VanContact Winter
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental VanContact Winter
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Continental VanContact Winter
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental VanContact Winter
95%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental VanContact Winter
74%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Snow

Snow
Continental VanContact Winter
85%

Dry

Dry
Continental VanContact Winter
62%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental VanContact Winter
72%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental VanContact Winter
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental VanContact Winter
65%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Ice

Ice
Continental VanContact Winter
74%

Costs

Costs
Continental VanContact Winter
43%
Falken e.Ziex
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison