Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Premium

Continental

VanContact Winter

R14 – R17

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

R14 – R17

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

VanContact Winter

Blizzak W810

Number of tests

1

2

1

Best position

#13

#1

#7

Average position

13.0

1.0

7.0

Latest test

2019

Available sizes

15

46

56

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

49%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

83%

Continental

VanContact Winter

56%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Wet Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

Continental VanContact Winter

87%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

40%

Wet Handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

Continental VanContact Winter

90%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

34%

Wet Circle Cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

Continental VanContact Winter

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

61%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

Continental VanContact Winter

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Aquaplaning Cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

Continental VanContact Winter

78%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Dry Performance

82%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Continental

VanContact Winter

78%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Dry Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

Continental VanContact Winter

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Snow Performance

68%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

77%

Continental

VanContact Winter

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Snow Braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

78%

Continental VanContact Winter

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Snow Traction

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

72%

Continental VanContact Winter

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

83%

Snow Handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

53%

Continental VanContact Winter

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

76%

Ice Performance

86%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

74%

Continental

VanContact Winter

74%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Ice Braking Abs

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

86%

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Ice Lateral Guidance

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

86%

Continental VanContact Winter

74%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Comfort & Noise

66%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

69%

Continental

VanContact Winter

56%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Noise Exterior

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

Continental VanContact Winter

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

44%

Noise Interior

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

60%

Continental VanContact Winter

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Economy

90%

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

74%

Continental

VanContact Winter

76%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

Fuel Efficiency

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

91%

Continental VanContact Winter

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

84%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

Continental VanContact Winter

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
ADAC	Winter	2019	205/65 R16	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental VanContact Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810

ACTIVAN WINTER

VanContact Winter

Blizzak W810

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison