18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
2
3
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
23
40

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison