18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
2
18
Best position
#13
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
1.0
6.1
Latest test
2019
2025
2024
Available sizes
15
23
47

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison