18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Firestone Roadhawk 2

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Number of tests
1
2
6
Best position
#13
#1
#3
Average position
13.0
1.0
4.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
23
146

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison