18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
1
2
3
5
Best position
#13
#1
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
1.0
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
23
34
63

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison