18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
2
3
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
23
34

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison