18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than BFGoodrich (75%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER was done in 2019, compared to 2025 when was the Continental UltraContact NXT first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Continental UltraContact NXT has A rating.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
1
2
Best position
#13
#1
Average position
13.0
1.0
Latest test
2019
2025
Available sizes
15
23

Wet

Wet
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%

Dry

Dry
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Costs

Costs
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison