18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental UltraContact

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than BFGoodrich (75%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER was done in 2019, compared to 2023 when was the Continental UltraContact first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Continental UltraContact has A rating.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
UltraContact
Number of tests
1
1
Best position
#13
#7
Average position
13.0
7.0
Latest test
2019
2023
Available sizes
15
88

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Continental UltraContact
75%
Costs
Confidence
Continental UltraContact
88%
Dry
Confidence
Continental UltraContact
91%
Comfort
Confidence
Continental UltraContact
75%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTyreLab.com

GET

TheTyreLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.