18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Continental PremiumContact 7Premium
ContinentalContinental

PremiumContact 7

9.8
R16 – R21
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Also compare with
Ventus Evo Pilot Sport 4 S Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
1
26
3
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
2.2
3.3
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
Available sizes
15
66
60

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison