18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
1
26
3
5
Best position
#13
#1
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
2.2
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
66
34
63

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison