18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than BFGoodrich (75%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER was done in 2019, compared to 2023 when was the Continental PremiumContact 7 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Continental PremiumContact 7 has A rating.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
1
26
Best position
#13
#1
Average position
13.0
2.2
Latest test
2019
2026
Available sizes
15
66

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison