18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
36
3
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
3.1
3.7
Latest test
2019
2023
2025
Available sizes
15
296
34

Wet

Wet
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
29%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
53%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%

Costs

Costs
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Fuel efficiency
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
91%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison