18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
1
33
10
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
4.1
6.0
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
Available sizes
15
658
104

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
29%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
53%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Fuel efficiency
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
91%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison