18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
33
3
Best position
#13
#1
#2
Average position
13.0
4.1
3.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
658
34

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
29%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
53%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Fuel efficiency
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
91%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison