18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
1
33
2
Best position
#13
#1
#1
Average position
13.0
4.1
1.0
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
658
23

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
29%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
53%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%
Fuel efficiency
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
91%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison