18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
Bridgestone Blizzak W810Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak W810

R14 – R17
Kumho PorTran CW51Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

PorTran CW51

R14 – R17
Also compare with
Turanza T005

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Bridgestone
Blizzak W810
Kumho
PorTran CW51
Number of tests
1
1
1
Best position
#13
#7
#8
Average position
13.0
7.0
8.0
Latest test
2019
2019
2019
Available sizes
15
56
21

Wet

Wet
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
51%
Kumho PorTran CW51
61%

Dry

Dry
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Kumho PorTran CW51
67%

Snow

Snow
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%
Kumho PorTran CW51
70%

Comfort

Comfort
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
58%
Kumho PorTran CW51
71%

Ice

Ice
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
74%
Kumho PorTran CW51
78%

Costs

Costs
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
73%
Kumho PorTran CW51
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 1 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Winter
2019205/65 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison