18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
1
14
15
Best position
#13
#8
#2
Average position
13.0
13.4
9.0
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
15
153
225

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Wet performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
29%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
82%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry performance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
Dry driving behavior
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
53%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
66%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Fuel efficiency
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison