18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
1
14
3
Best position
#13
#8
#2
Average position
13.0
13.4
3.3
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
Available sizes
15
153
60

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison