Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16

VS

Upper-middle

BFGoodrich

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

ACTIVAN WINTER

Advantage

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Number of tests

1

14

3

1

Best position

#13

#8

#2

#1

Average position

13.0

13.4

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

Available sizes

15

153

34

64

Wet

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet circle cornering

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet handling

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

23%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

56%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

40%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Dry

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry braking

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

82%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Comfort

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

71%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Costs

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Mileage

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER

89%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

ACTIVAN WINTER

Advantage

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison