18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
1
14
3
5
Best position
#13
#8
#2
#1
Average position
13.0
13.4
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
15
153
34
63

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison