18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTERUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

ACTIVAN WINTER

R14 – R16
BFGoodrich AdvantageUpper-middle
BFGoodrichBFGoodrich

Advantage

6.8
R14 – R20
Continental UltraContact NXTPremium
ContinentalContinental

UltraContact NXT

9.5
R16 – R20
Also compare with
Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7 Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
1
14
2
Best position
#13
#8
#1
Average position
13.0
13.4
1.0
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
15
153
23

Wet

Wet
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Dry

Dry
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%

Comfort

Comfort
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Costs

Costs
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison