18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Pirelli Cinturato (C3) vs. Falken e.Ziex

BF Goodrich g-GripUpper-middle
BFBF

Goodrich g-Grip

R14 – R15
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)Premium
PirelliPirelli

Cinturato (C3)

9.4
R16 – R20
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 WinterContact TS 870 Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Pirelli
Cinturato (C3)
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
4
3
Best position
#6
#1
#2
Average position
19.3
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
2
—
34

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
94%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
100%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
94%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
89%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
87%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
87%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
100%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
100%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Pirelli Cinturato (C3)
89%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison