18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

BF Goodrich g-GripUpper-middle
BFBF

Goodrich g-Grip

R14 – R15
Michelin e.PrimacyPremium
MichelinMichelin

e.Primacy

7.1
R15 – R21
Hankook Ventus EvoPremium
HankookHankook

Ventus Evo

9.8
R17 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 WinterContact TS 870 Ventus Evo

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Michelin
e.Primacy
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
4
3
3
Best position
#6
#3
#2
#2
Average position
19.3
12.0
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2019
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
2
111
60
34

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Michelin e.Primacy
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Michelin e.Primacy
65%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Michelin e.Primacy
52%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Falken e.Ziex
69%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Michelin e.Primacy
81%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Michelin e.Primacy
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Falken e.Ziex
81%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
62%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Michelin e.Primacy
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison