18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

BF Goodrich g-Grip

Goodrich g-Grip

VS

Michelin e.Primacy

Michelin

e.Primacy

Hankook Ventus Evo

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Goodrich g-Grip

Michelin

e.Primacy

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

6

4

3

Best position

#6

#3

#2

Average position

19.3

12.0

3.3

Latest test

2019

2025

2026

Available sizes

2

111

60

Wet

Wet

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet circle cornering

BF Goodrich g-Grip

98%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Wet handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

BF Goodrich g-Grip

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BF Goodrich g-Grip

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Costs

Costs

BF Goodrich g-Grip

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Dry

Dry

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Comfort

Comfort

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Exterior noise

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison