18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo

BF Goodrich g-Grip

Goodrich g-Grip

VS

Michelin e.Primacy

Michelin

e.Primacy

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Goodrich g-Grip

Michelin

e.Primacy

Falken

e.Ziex

Hankook

ION Evo

Number of tests

6

4

3

1

Best position

#6

#3

#2

#1

Average position

19.3

12.0

3.7

1.0

Latest test

2019

2025

2025

2025

Available sizes

2

111

34

64

Wet

Wet

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

89%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

BF Goodrich g-Grip

78%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BF Goodrich g-Grip

87%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet circle cornering

BF Goodrich g-Grip

98%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Costs

Costs

BF Goodrich g-Grip

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Rolling resistance

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

67%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Comfort

Comfort

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dry

Dry

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison