18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex

BF Goodrich g-Grip

Goodrich g-Grip

VS

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Goodrich g-Grip

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

6

15

3

Best position

#6

#2

#2

Average position

19.3

9.0

3.7

Latest test

2019

2025

2025

Available sizes

2

225

34

Wet

Wet

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet circle cornering

BF Goodrich g-Grip

98%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Wet handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

89%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

BF Goodrich g-Grip

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BF Goodrich g-Grip

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Costs

Costs

BF Goodrich g-Grip

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Price/value

BF Goodrich g-Grip

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dry

Dry

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Comfort

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison