18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Bridgestone
Turanza T005
Number of tests
6
15
33
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
19.3
9.0
4.1
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
2
225
658

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
82%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
73%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
78%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
85%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
81%
Price/value
BF Goodrich g-Grip
68%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
53%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
93%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
69%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
76%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
62%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
83%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%
Bridgestone Turanza T005
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2019225/45 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison