18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

BF Goodrich g-Grip

Goodrich g-Grip

VS

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BF) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, BF summer tyres are slightly better rated (62%) than Kumho (59%). The first tyre test of BF Goodrich g-Grip was done in 2016, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the Goodrich g-Grip and the Ecsta PS71 were tested.

Test Profile

Goodrich g-Grip

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

6

15

Best position

#6

#2

Average position

19.3

9.0

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

2

225

Wet

Wet

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

BF Goodrich g-Grip

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BF Goodrich g-Grip

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Wet circle cornering

BF Goodrich g-Grip

98%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Wet handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

89%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Costs

Costs

BF Goodrich g-Grip

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Price/value

BF Goodrich g-Grip

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Rolling resistance

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Mileage

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Comfort

Comfort

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Dry

Dry

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
Autobild	Summer	2019	225/45 R17	View

Add to comparison