18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

BF Goodrich g-Grip

Goodrich g-Grip

VS

Hankook Ventus Evo

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Goodrich g-Grip

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

6

3

15

Best position

#6

#2

#2

Average position

19.3

3.3

9.0

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

Available sizes

2

60

225

Wet

Wet

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

BF Goodrich g-Grip

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BF Goodrich g-Grip

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Wet circle cornering

BF Goodrich g-Grip

98%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Costs

Costs

BF Goodrich g-Grip

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Mileage

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Price/value

BF Goodrich g-Grip

68%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Rolling resistance

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Comfort

Comfort

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Dry

Dry

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison