18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
6
3
5
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
19.3
3.3
2.2
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
2
60
63

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison