18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

BF Goodrich g-Grip

Goodrich g-Grip

VS

Hankook Ventus Evo

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Falken e.Ziex

Falken

e.Ziex

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Goodrich g-Grip

Hankook

Ventus Evo

Falken

e.Ziex

Number of tests

6

3

3

Best position

#6

#2

#2

Average position

19.3

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

Available sizes

2

60

34

Wet

Wet

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BF Goodrich g-Grip

87%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

89%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

BF Goodrich g-Grip

78%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Costs

Costs

BF Goodrich g-Grip

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dry

Dry

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Comfort

Comfort

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison