18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparator | Contact Us

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

BF Goodrich g-Grip

Goodrich g-Grip

VS

Hankook ION Evo

Hankook

ION Evo

Kumho Ecsta PS71

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Also compare with

WinterContact TS 870

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Goodrich g-Grip

Hankook

ION Evo

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

6

1

15

Best position

#6

#1

#2

Average position

19.3

1.0

9.0

Latest test

2019

2025

2025

Available sizes

2

64

225

Wet

Wet

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet circle cornering

BF Goodrich g-Grip

98%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Wet handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

89%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

BF Goodrich g-Grip

78%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

BF Goodrich g-Grip

87%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Costs

Costs

BF Goodrich g-Grip

71%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Mileage

BF Goodrich g-Grip

88%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Price/value

BF Goodrich g-Grip

68%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

63%

Rolling resistance

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

73%

Dry

Dry

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry handling

BF Goodrich g-Grip

94%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

81%

Comfort

Comfort

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

BF Goodrich g-Grip

64%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison