18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
Hankook
ION Evo
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
6
1
15
Best position
#6
#1
#2
Average position
19.3
1.0
9.0
Latest test
2019
2025
2025
Available sizes
2
64
225

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Price/value
BF Goodrich g-Grip
68%
Hankook ION Evo
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
63%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
73%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
81%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison