18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-Grip vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

BF
Goodrich g-Grip
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Number of tests
6
3
2
Best position
#6
#2
#1
Average position
19.3
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2019
2026
2025
Available sizes
2
40
23

Wet

Wet
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Aquaplaning - cross
BF Goodrich g-Grip
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BF Goodrich g-Grip
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Wet circle cornering
BF Goodrich g-Grip
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Wet handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%

Costs

Costs
BF Goodrich g-Grip
71%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Rolling resistance
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Mileage
BF Goodrich g-Grip
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Exterior noise
BF Goodrich g-Grip
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%

Dry

Dry
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Dry handling
BF Goodrich g-Grip
94%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison